Butter, margarine & total cardiovascular disease (CVD)

Data about this relation was provided by only one cohort (Panagiotakos D). The combined consumption of butter & margarine did not significantly affect CVD risk.


Butter, margarine & coronary heart disease (CHD).

Butter.

Data about 4 different cohorts was found, including 3,250+ cases (the amount of cases was not defined in one cohort).

Results: A significantly increased disease risk was found in one cohort of small size among individuals from all ethnic groups, except Caucasians (Gartside PS). No other associations were found.
Effect modification: Data about effect modification was provided by one cohort (Gartside PS). Except for a modifying effect of ethnicity, no interactions were found with serum cholesterol, physical activity, BMI, and several other variables.

Conclusion: Few associations were found. No evidence was found for an association between butter and CHD.

Margarine.

Data about 5 different cohorts was found, including 1,783+ cases (the amount of cases was not defined in one cohort).

Results: A significantly increased disease risk was found in one cohort (Willet WC), while a significant protective effect against mortality was found in another cohort (Kushi LH). No other associations were found.
Effect modification: No data was found.

Conclusion: Inconsistent findings were done. No evidence was found for an association between margarine and CHD (Average RR = 1.20, but the protective effect from Kushi LH [8] could not be included in this analysis, because no amount of cases was defined).

Butter vs Margarine.

For this analysis, data was included from within-cohort comparisons of the effect of butter vs margarine. 6 cohorts compared the effect of butter vs margarine.

Results:

  • Holmberg S (2009) OR = 1.10 (0.78-1.56) for low fat margarine or no fat vs butter.
  • Iso H (2007) Among men, risk was 0.81 (0.56-1.15) for butter, and 0.89 (0.67-1.17) for margarine. Among women, risk was 0.77 (0.48-1.24) for butter, and 0.90 (0.66-1.22) for margarine.
  • Soinio M (2003) Risk was 6.9% in men who used margarine, and 14.6 in men who used butter (P = 0.043). No significant association was found among women.
  • Whiteman D (1999) RR = 1.81 (0.87-3.79) for use of hard margarine vs butter (The RR for polyunsaturate vs butter was: 1.23).
  • Willet WC (1993) No association was found with butter (no data shown). RR = 1.66 (1.10-2.49; P = 0.02) for margarine)
  • Shaper AG (1991) RR = 0.87 (0.79-1.06) for use of butter vs margarine.

Risk was lower from butter consumption than from margarine consumption in one cohort, including 431 cases (Willet WC). In contrast, risk was lower from margarine than from butter in another cohort among men only, including 41 male cases (Soinio M). No other associations were found, but the RRs were lower for butter than for margarine in all 4 remaining cohorts.
5 cohorts including 2.056 cases provided RR's, but no RR's were available from one cohort including 65 cases in which opposite findings were done (Soinio M. 2003). The average RR for use of margarine instead of butter = 1.28.

Conclusion: No significant differences were found between the effects of butter vs margarine on heart disease, but the RRs were lower for butter in 5 out of 6 cohorts. Within-cohort comparisons showed an average RR of 1.28 for use of margarine instead of butter.

Prospective studies of butter and CHD:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
28) Warensjö E (2010)The NSHDSNot definedRiskNo significant association.
19) Iso H (2007)The JACC Study521 men, and

340 women
MortalityMen: HR = 0.81 (0.56-1.15).

Women: HR = 0.77 (0.48-1.24).
12) Gartside PS (1998)The NHANES I1,958RiskA significantly increased risk among all ethnic groups, except Caucasians.
5) Willet WC (1993)The Nurses' Health Study431RiskNo significant association.
Total number of cases: 3,250 + X


Prospective studies of margarine and CHD:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
19) Iso H (2007)The JACC Study517 men, and

333 women
MortalityMen: HR = 0.89 (0.67-1.17).

Women: HR = 0.90 (0.66-1.22).
8) Kushi LH (1996)The Iowa Women's Health StudyNot definedMortalityRR = 0.59 (0.36-0.97; P = 0.048).
6) Knekt P (1994)The Finnish Mobile Clinic Health Cohort186 men, and

58 women
MortalityMen: RR = 0.85 (0.59-1.24; P = 0.39).

Women: RR = 0.88 (0.44-1.74; P = 0.77).
5) Willet WC (1993)The Nurses' Health Study431RiskRR = 1.66 (1.10-2.49; P = 0.02).
4) Shaper AG (1991)The British Regional Heart Study258RiskRR = 0.57 (0.22-1.46) for no use vs use.
Total number of cases: 1,783 + XAverage RR = 1.20

Margarine, butter & stroke.

4 articles, providing information about 4 different cohorts were found. The relation with total stroke mortality was examined in 2 cohorts (Yochum LA; Iso H 2007), and the relation with subtypes of stroke risk was examined in the other 2 cohorts (Iso H 2001; Larsson SC).

Results: The association with margarine was examined in 3 cohorts, including 2,184 cases (Iso H 2001; Yochum LA; Iso H 2007). Protective effects were found among women in all 3 cohorts, which were significant twice (Iso H 2001; Iso H 2007). No association was found among men in the only available cohort (Iso H 2007).
The association with butter was examined in 3 cohorts, including 5,269 cases (Iso H 2001; Iso H 2007; Larsson SC). Increased risks of intracerebral hemorrhage were found in both cohorts which examined the association (Iso H 2001; Larsson SC). In one cohort the risk, but not the trend was significant (Larsson SC). No other associations were found.

Inclusion of intermediate levels of consumption:
Significant protective effects of margarine consumption against total stroke mortality among women were found at consumption ≥ 1 time/week in one cohort (Iso H 2007), and at the intermediate level of consumption 4-7 times/week in the other cohort (Yochum LA).


RRs for the association between margarine consumption and total stroke mortality among women (frequency of consumption/week):



Effect modification: No data was found.

Conclusion: Protective effects of margarine against stroke mortality were found among women in 2 cohorts of moderate-large size. Margarine possibly protects against total stroke mortality among women at consumption 4-7 times/week (Average RR = 0.73).
Increased intracerebral hemorrhage risks of butter were found in 2 cohorts of moderate-large size. And no other associations were found. Butter possibly increases risk of intracerebral hemmorhage. The level of consumption for - and strength of - this effect could not be defined.

Prospective studies of butter and stroke:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
23) Larsson SC (2009)The ATBC Study2,702 ischemic stroke risk.

383 intracerebral hemorrhage risk.

196 subarachnoid hemorrhage risk
Stroke riskIschemic stroke: RR = 1.00 (0.87-1.14; P = 0.99).

Intracerebral hemorrhage: RR = 1.44 (1.01-2.07; P = 0.19).

Subarachnoid hemorrhage: RR = 0.98 (0.59-1.64; P = 0.87).
19) Iso H (2007)The JACC Study1,040 men, and
874 women
Stroke mortalityMen: HR = 0.96 (0.76-1.22).

Women: HR = 0.96 (0.75-1.24).
5) Iso H (2001)The Nurses' Health Study74Intracerebral hemorrhage riskA positive association.
Total number of cases: 5,269Average RR = 1.02


Prospective studies of margarine and stroke:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
19) Iso H (2007)The JACC Study1,038 men, and
857 women
Stroke mortalityMen: HR = 0.99 (0.82-1.19).

Women: HR = 0.77 (0.63-0.95; P = < 0.05).
8) Yochum LA (2000)The Iowa women's Health Study215Stroke mortalityRR = 0.64 (0.41-1.00; P = 0.10).
5) Iso H (2001)The Nurses' Health Study74Intracerebral hemorrhage riskA significant inverse association.
Total number of cases: 2,184Average RR = 0.86