Consumption of dietary cholesterol and cardiovascular disease.

Dietary cholesterol and total cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Results: Data was provided by 5 cohorts, including 1,340 cases.
Significantly increased risks were found in 2 cohorts (Shekelle RB [1], Tanasescu M [13]) including 1,015 cases (76% of all cases), and a nonsignificantly increased risk was found in a third cohort (Houston DK [45]). RR's were available from 4 cohorts. The average RR = 1.41.
Effect modification:

  • Increased risks were found in all 3 US cohorts, while no associations were found in both Finnish (European) cohorts.
  • Risk significantly increased among subjects with type 2 diabetes, but not among subjects without diabetes in one cohort (Houston DK [45]).
  • No effect modification was found by serum cholesterol (Shekelle RB [1]).

Subjects with prevalent disease: Two cohorts included subjects with type 2 diabetes (Tanasescu M [13], Houston DK [45]). Significantly increased risks were found in both cohorts. The average RR = 1.54. One cohort included subjects with CHD only (Erkillä AT [28]). No association was found.

Conclusion: Significantly increased risks were found in 2 cohorts, and a nonsignificantly increased risk was found in a third cohort. Since 4 out of 5 cohorts in the analysis were of very small size, evidence was judged suggestive for an increased risk (+ 41%) of total cardiovascular disease from high consumption of dietary cholesterol. No clear level of consumption could be defined for this effect. The limited amount of evidence suggests possible effect modification by type 2 diabetes, and/or geographic area.

Prospective studies of dietary cholesterol and total cardiovascular disease:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
45) Houston DK (2010)The Health ABC Study203RiskHR = 1.47 (0.93-2.32; P = 0.10).
32) Laaksonen DE (2005)The Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study78MortalityNo significant association.
28) Erkkilä AT (2003)The Finnish Cohort of the EUROASPIRE Study44RiskRR = 1.10 (0.81-1.50; P = 0.58).
13) Tanasescu M (2004)The Nurses' Health Study619RiskRR = 1.39 (1.04-1.88; P = 0.01).
1) Shekelle RB (1989)The Western Electric Study396MortalityRH = 1.46 (1.10-1.94).
Total number of cases: 1,340Average RR = 1.41


Prospective studies of dietary cholesterol and total cardiovascular disease among subjects with type 2 diabetes:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
45) Houston DK (2010)The Health ABC Study45RiskHR = 3.66 (1.09-12.29; P = 0.04).
13) Tanasescu M (2004)The Nurses' Health Study619RiskRR = 1.39 (1.04-1.88; P = 0.01).
Total number of cases: 664Average RR = 1.54

Dietary cholesterol and coronary heart disease (CHD).

Results:
Coronary heart disease risk: Data was provided by 16 cohorts, including 5,130 cases.
A significantly increased risk was found in one cohort of small size (Mann JI [21]). And nonsignificantly increased risks were found in 3 (sub)cohorts, which were all of (very) small size (Shekelle RB [1], Kushi LH [8], Knekt P [15]. No other associations were found. RR's were available from 9 cohorts. The average RR = 1.09.
Coronary heart disease mortality: Data was provided by 14 cohorts, including 2,088 cases.
A significantly increased risk was found in one cohort of small size (Mann JI [21]). And nonsignificantly increased risks were found in 3 (sub)cohorts, which were all of (very) small size (Shekelle RB [1], Kushi LH [8], Knekt P [15]. No other associatons were found. RR's were available from 7 cohorts. The average RR = 1.16.
Effect modification:

  • No consistent effect modification was found by age (Posner BM [5], Esrey KL [18], Xu J [35]).
  • In one cohort of very small size, risk increased among subjects with subscapular skinfold thickness of ≤ 14 mm, only (Goff DC [1]).
  • No significant effect modification was found by hypertension, serum cholesterol, sex, and smoking (Knekt P [15]), or urban/rural status (Garcia-Palmieri MR [4]).

Subjects with prevalent disease: One cohort included subjects with CHD only (Erkkilä AT [28]). No association was found.

Conclusion: Some increased risks were found, but these were mostly nonsignificant, and always restricted to cohorts of (very) small size. Though the effect sizes of the average RR's do not exclude the possibility of any association, no evidence was found for an association between dietary cholesterol consumption and coronary heart disease.

Prospective studies of dietary cholesterol and coronary heart disease risk:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
35) Xu J (2006)The Strong Heart Study403RiskHR = 1.09 (0.77-1.54; P = 0.43).
28) Erkkilä AT (2003)The Finnish cohort of the EUROASPIRE Study34RiskRR = 0.97 (0.68-1.40; P = 0.89).
21) Mann JI (1997)The Oxford Vegetarian Study45MortalityDRR = 353 (157-796; P = < 0.001).
19) Pietinen P (1997)The ATBC Study1,399RiskRR = 0.93 (0.79-1.10; P = 0.81).
18) Esrey KL (1996)The Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Follow-Up Study52 aged < 60, and

40 aged ≥ 60
MortalityAged < 60: RR = 1.00 (0.99-1.02).

Aged ≥ 60: RR = 1.01 (0.98-1.03).
16) Kromhout D (1995)No cohort name defined58MortalityNo significant association.
15) Knekt P (1994)The Finnish Mobile Clinic Health Cohort186 men, and

58 women
MortalityMen: A nonsignificantly increased risk (P = 0.08).

Women: No significant association (P = 0.43).
13) Hu FB (1997)The Nurses' Health Study939RiskRR = 1.17 (0.92-1.50; P = 0.24).
13) Ascherio A (1996)The Health Professionals Follow Up Study734RiskRR = 1.03 (0.81-1.32; P = 0.48).
8) Kushi LH (1985)The Ireland-Boston Diet-Heart Study110MortalityA nonsignificantly increased risk (P = 0.10).
7) Kromhout D (1984)The Zutphen Study30MortalityNo significant association (P = 0.71).
6) Marr JW (1981)No cohort name defined50MortalityNo significant association.
5) Posner BM (1991)The Framingham Study99 aged < 56, and

114 aged ≥ 56
RiskAged < 56: RR = 0.99 (0.82-1.10) for low vs high consumption.

Aged ≥ 56: RR = 0.93 (0.79-1.09) for low vs high consumption.
5) Gordon T (1981)The Puerto Rico Heart Health Program163RiskNo significant association.
3) McGee DL (1984)The Honolulu Heart Program309RiskNo significant association.
1) Shekelle RB (1989)The Western Electric Study307MortalityRH = 1.38 (1.00-1.90).
Total number of cases: 5,130Average RR = 1.09


Prospective studies of dietary cholesterol and coronary heart disease mortality:
AuthorCohort nameCasesRelative Risk (RR)
35) Xu J (2006)The Strong Heart Study46 aged < 60, and

92 aged ≥ 60
Aged < 60: HR = 1.53 (0.46-5.13; P = 0.77).

Aged ≥ 60: HR = 0.76 (0.38-1.54; P = 0.41).
28) Erkkilä AT (2003)The Finnish cohort of The EUROASPIRE Study16RR = 0.76 (0.45-1.28; P = 0.30).
21) Mann JI (1997)The Oxford Vegetarian Study45DRR = 353 (157-796; P = < 0.001).
19) Pietinen P (1997)The ATBC Study635RR = 0.92 (0.72-1.18; P = 0.77).
18) Esrey KL (1996)The Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Follow-Up Study52 aged < 60, and

40 aged ≥ 60
Aged < 60: RR = 1.00 (0.99-1.02).

Aged ≥ 60: RR = 1.01 (0.98-1.03).
16) Kromhout D (1995)No cohort name defined58No significant association.
15) Knekt P (1994)The Finnish Mobile Clinic Health Cohort186 men, and

58 women
Men: A nonsignificantly increased risk (P = 0.08).

Women: No significant association (P = 0.43).
13) Ascherio A (1996)The Health Professionals Follow Up Study229RR = 1.25 (0.80-1.97; P = 0.21).
8) Kushi LH (1985)The Ireland-Boston Diet-Heart Study110A nonsignificantly increased risk (P = 0.10).
7) Kromhout D (1984)The Zutphen Study30No significant association (P = 0.71).
5) Gordon T (1981)The Framingham Study14No significant association.
5) Gordon T (1981)The Puerto Rico Heart Health Program71No significant association.
3) McGee DL (1985)The Honolulu Heart Program99No significant association.
1) Shekelle RB (1989)The Western Electric Study307RH = 1.38 (1.00-1.90).
Total number of cases: 2,088Average RR = 1.16



Dietary cholesterol and stroke.

Results:
Total stroke: Data was provided by 6 cohorts, including 1,165 cases.
No significant associations were found. RR's were available from 3 cohorts. The average RR = 1.05.
Ischemic stroke: Data was provided by 4 cohorts, including 823 cases.
No significant associations were found. RR's were available from 2 cohorts. The average RR = 0.90.
Hemorrhagic stroke: Data was provided by 3 cohorts, including 308 cases.
No significant associations were found. The average RR = 1.01.
Effect modification: No data was found.
Subjects with prevalent disease: No data was found.

Conclusion: No significant associations were found with total stroke, or any stroke subtype. No evidence was found for an association between dietary cholesterol consumption and stroke.

Prospective studies of dietary cholesterol and total stroke:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
20) Ross RK (1997)No cohort name defined245MortalityRR = 1.2 (0.8-1.7).
13) He K (2003)The Health Professionals Follow Up Study455 ischaemic stroke, and

125 haemorrhagic stroke
RiskIschaemic stroke: RR = 0.93 (0.66-1.30; P = 0.63).

Haemorrhagic stroke: RR = 1.16 (0.61-2.20; P = 0.37).
12) Simon JA (1995)The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial96RiskNo significant association.
9) Seino F (1997)The Shibata Study141RiskRR = 1.11 (0.48-2.56; P = 0.58).
7) Keli SO (1994)The Zutphen Study42RiskNo significant association.
3) McGee DL (1985)The Honolulu Heart Program61MortalityNo significant association.
Total number of cases: 1,165Average RR = 1.05


Prospective studies of dietary cholesterol and ischemic stroke:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
41) Boden-Albala B (2009)The Northerh Manhattan Study142RiskNo significant association.
30) Sauvaget C (2004)The Adult Health Study60MortalityRH = 0.65 (0.29-1.45).
25) Iso H (2003)No cohort name defined166RiskNo significant association.
13) He K (2003)The Health Professionals Follow Up Study455RiskRR = 0.93 (0.66-1.30; P = 0.63).
Total number of cases: 823Average RR = 0.90


Prospective studies of dietary cholesterol and hemorrhagic stroke:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
25) Iso H (2003)No cohort name defined68 intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and

41 subarachnoid hemorrhage
RiskIntraparenchymal hemorrhage: RR = 0.71 (0.35-1.41; P = 0.25).

Subarachnoid hemorrhage: No significant association.
13) He K (2003)The Health Professionals Follow Up Study125Haemorrhagic stroke riskRR = 1.16 (0.61-2.20; P = 0.37).
13) Iso H (2001)The Nurses' Health Study74Intraparenchymal hemorrhage riskRR = 1.04 (0.46-2.38; P = 0.98).
Total number of cases: 308Average RR = 1.01