Consumption of dietary trans fat and cardiovascular disease.

Trans fat and total cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Results: Data was provided by 2 cohorts, including 822 cases.
No associations were found. The average RR = 1.02.
Effect modification: No data was found.
Subjects with prevalent disease: One cohort included women with type 2 diabetes only (Tanasescu M [13]). No association was found.

Conclusion: No associations were found. No evidence was found for an association between trans fat consumption and total cardiovascular disease.

Prospective studies of dietary trans fat and total cardiovascular disease:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
45) Houston DK (2010)The Health ABC Study203RiskHR = 0.97 (0.65-1.44; P = 0.85).
13) Tanasescu M (2004)The Nurses' Health Study619RiskRR = 1.03 (0.73-1.44; P = 0.74).
Total number of cases: 822Average RR = 1.02

Trans fat and coronary heart disease (CHD).

Results:
Total trans fat: Data about the relation with CHD risk was provided by 6 cohorts, including 4,774 cases.
Significantly increased risks were found in 2 cohorts (Oomen CM [7], Oh K [13]), including 1,864 cases (39% of all cases). No other associations were found, but all RR's were > 1. The average RR = 1.22.
Data about the relation with CHD mortality was provided by 4 cohorts, including 1,051 cases.
A significantly increased risk was found in 1 cohort (Pietinen P [19]). No other associations were found. The average RR = 1.33.
Processed/vegetable trans fat: Data was provided by 3 cohorts, including 1,089 cases.
Significantly increased risks were found in 2 cohorts of moderate-large size (Willet WC [13], Pietinen P [19]). The average RR = 1.39.
Ruminant/animal trans fat: Data was provided by 4 cohorts, including 1,463 cases.
A significant protective effect was found in one cohort (Pietinen P [19]). No other associations were found. The average RR = 0.85.



RRs for the association between total trans fat and coronary heart disease risk among men and women (in energy%):

RRs for the association between processed/vegetable trans fat and coronary heart risk disease among men and women (in g/day):


Effect modification:

  • No consistent effect modification was found by age (Oh K [13], Jakobsen MU [29], Xu J [35]).
  • In one cohort of large size, risk increased significantly among women with a BMI < 25, but not among women with a BMI ≥ 25 (Oh K [13]).

Subjects with prevalent disease: No data was found.

Conclusion: Significantly increased risks of total trans fat against CHD risk were found in 2 out of 6 cohorts, one of which was of very small size. Suggestive evidence was found that total trans fat consumption increases CHD risk (+ 22%). No clear level of consumption could be defined for this effect, but it can not be excluded that risk increases at any level of consumption.Stratified analysis showed significant differences between processed and ruminant trans fat. Significantly increased risks of processed trans fat against CHD risk were found in 2 cohorts of moderate-large size. Processed trans fat possibly increases CHD risk at consumption ≥ 5.1-5.7 g/day (+ 39%).

Prospective studies of dietary trans fat and coronary heart disease risk:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
35) Xu J (2006)The Strong Heart Study403RiskHR = 1.06 (0.78-1.44; P = 0.88).
29) Jakobsen MU (2008)Four Danish cohorts374RiskHR = 1.05 (0.92-1.19).
19) Pietinen P (1997)The ATBC Study1,399RiskRR = 1.14 (0.96-1.35; P = 0.16).
13) Oh K (2005)The Nurses' Health Study1,766RiskRR = 1.33 (1.07-1.66; P = 0.01).
13) Ascherio A (1996)The Health Professionals Follow Up Study734RiskRR = 1.21 (0.93-1.58; P = 0.20).
7) Oomen CM (2001)The Zutphen Elderly Study98RiskRR = 2.00 (1.07-3.75; P = 0.03).
Total number of cases: 4,774Average RR = 1.22


Prospective studies of dietary trans fat and coronary heart disease mortality:
AuthorCohort nameCasesRelative Risk (RR)
35) Xu J (2006)The Strong Heart Study46 aged < 60, and

92 aged ≥ 60
Aged < 60: HR = 1.15 (0.49-2.68; P = 0.66).

Aged ≥ 60: HR = 0.83 (0.42-1.66; P = 0.54).
19) Pietinen P (1997)The ATBC Study635RR = 1.39 (1.09-1.78; P = 0.004).
13) Ascherio A (1996)The Health Professionals Follow Up Study229RR = 1.41 (0.86-2.32; P = 0.42).
7) Oomen CM (2001)The Zutphen Elderly Study49RR = 1.33 (0.96-1.86).
Total number of cases: 1,051Average RR = 1.33


Prospective studies of dietary processed/vegetable trans fat and coronary heart disease:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
19) Pietinen PThe ATBC Study635MortalityRR = 1.23 (0.97-1.55; P = 0.004).
13) Willet WC (1993)The Nurses' Health Study356RiskRR = 1.78 (1.12-2.83; P = 0.009).
7) Oomen CM (2001)The Zutphen Elderly Study98RiskRR = 1.05 (0.94-1.17).
Total number of cases: 1,089Average RR = 1.39


Prospective studies of dietary ruminant/animal trans fat and coronary heart disease:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
29) Jakobsen MU (2008)4 Danish cohorts374RiskHR = 1.05 (0.92-1.19).
19) Pietinen PThe ATBC Study635MortalityRR = 0.83 (0.62-1.11; P = 0.035).
13) Willet WC (1993)The Nurses' Health Study356RiskRR = 0.59 (0.30-1.17; P = 0.23).
7) Oomen CM (2001)The Zutphen Elderly Study98RiskRR = 1.17 (0.69-1.98).
Total number of cases: 1,463Average RR = 0.85

Trans fat and stroke.

Results: Data was provided by 2 cohorts, including 654 cases.
No associations were found, though in one cohort risk increased among subjects with very low consumption (Iso H [13]). The average RR = 0.97.
Effect modification: No data was found.
Subjects with prevalent disease: No significant association was found among women with hypertension (Iso H [13]).

Conclusion: No associations were found. No evidence was found for an association between trans fat consumption and stroke.

Prospective studies of dietary trans fat and stroke:
AuthorCohort nameCasesEnd pointRelative Risk (RR)
13) He K (2003)The Health Professionals Follow Up Study455 ischaemic stroke, and

125 haemorrhagic stroke
RiskIschaemic stroke: RR = 0.80 (0.54-1.17; P = 0.26).

Haemorrhagic stroke: RR = 1.90 (0.90-3.98; P = 0.13).
13) Iso H (2001)The Nurses' Health Study74Intraparenchymal hemorrhage riskRR = 0.43 (0.17-1.10; P = 0.15).
Total number of cases: 654Average RR = 0.97