Fruit and colorectal cancer.

Primary variables of interest were colon cancer, or rectal cancer. But results from articles about some cohorts were not stratified by cancer site (colon + rectal), and only show associations with total colorectal cancer risk.

Interpretation of the first table (total fruit and total colorectal cancer risk):

  • Though articles about some cohorts (11, 13, 17, 23) did not stratify findings by cancer site, information about colon cancer from these cohorts was included in a pooled analysis (29), and is therefore discussed at the association between total fruit and colon cancer risk.
  • An early article about one cohort (27) stratified findings by cancer site, but used data of a follow-up period from 1996-2000, and included 2,972 colorectal cancer cases. A later article about the same cohort did not stratify findings by cancer site. It used data of a follow-up period from 1995-2003, and included 5,039 colorectal cancer cases. Data from the early article is discussed at the associations between total fruit and colon/rectal cancer risk. The later article is added to the following table, since there was a large difference in the amount of cases.
  • Data from a recent article about "The EPIC Study" stratified effects by cancer site (colon vs rectal). An earlier article from this cohort only provided information about total colorectal cancer risk. Data from this earlier article is merely added for perspective (18).
  • Site-stratified data from "The Multiethnic Cohort Study" was added to the specific sites. A more recent publication used a nested case-control design and included very few cases (30).
  • Data from the remaining 4 cohorts (14, 16, 20, 31) was not partially used in analysis with colon or rectal cancer, and is therefore completely additive to the model of colorectal cancer. No significant associations were found in any of these 4 cohorts.

| More information: back to literature review.|