| 29) Koushik A. (2007) | Pooled Analysis of 14 Cohort Studies. | 756,217 subjects (242,362 men and 513,855 women) | 6-20 years | 5,838? (1,890 men and 3,948 women). 3,063 proximal colon and 2,313 distal colon (data of colon site missing for 462 subjects) | Colon cancer risk | Leguminosa |
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
- Publication of a diet and cancer association.
- Diagnosis of at least 50 incident colorectal cancer cases.
- Assessment of usual diet.
- Conduct of a validation study of the dietary assessment method or a closely related instrument.
INCLUDED STUDIES (Follow-up years/No. of colon cancer cases). In the analysis, an extended follow-up period for most of the studies was included:
- The Adventist Health Study. (1976-1982/52 men, 67 women)
Singh PN, Fraser GE. Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Oct 15;148(8):761-74. Full text
- The Alpha-Tocopherol Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study. (1984-1999/187 men)
Pietinen P, Malila N, Virtanen M, Hartman TJ, Tangrea JA, Albanes D. Diet and risk of colorectal cancer in a cohort of Finnish men. Cancer Causes Control. 1999 Oct;10(5):387-96. Abstract
- The Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. (1992-1999/467 men, 349 women)
McCullough ML, Robertson AS, Chao A, Jacobs EJ, Stampfer MJ, Jacobs DR. A prospective study of whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and colon cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control. 2003 Dec;14(10):959-70. Abstract
- The Health Professionals Follow-up Study. (1986-2000/456 men)
Michels KB, Edward Giovannucci, Joshipura KJ, Rosner BA, Stampfer MJ, Fuchs CS. Prospective study of fruit and vegetable consumption and incidence of colon and rectal cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Nov 1;92(21):1740-52. Full text
- The Netherlands Cohort Study. (1986-1993/393 men, 353 women)
Voorrips LE, Goldbohm RA, van Poppel G, Sturmans F, Hermus RJ, van den Brandt PA. Vegetable and fruit consumption and risks of colon and rectal cancer in a prospective cohort study: The Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Dec 1;152(11):1081-92. Full text
- The New York State Cohort. (1980-1987/335 men, 223 women)
Bandera EV, Freudenheim JL, Marshall JR, Zielezny M, Priore RL, Brasure J. Diet and alcohol consumption and lung cancer risk in the New York State Cohort (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1997 Nov;8(6):828-40. Abstract
- The Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project Follow-up Study. (1987-1999/349 women)
Flood A, Velie EM, Chaterjee N, Subar AF, Thompson FE, Lacey JV Jr. Fruit and vegetable intakes and the risk of colorectal cancer in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project follow-up cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 May;75(5):936-43. Full text
- The Canadian National Breast Screening Study. (1980-2000/431 women)
Terry P, Jain M, Miller AB, Howe GR, Rohan TE. Dietary intake of folic acid and colorectal cancer risk in a cohort of women. Int J Cancer. 2002 Feb 20;97(6):864-7. Abstract
- The Iowa Women's Health Study. (1986-2001/799 women)
Steinmetz KA, Kushi LH, Bostick RM, Folsom AR, Potter JD. Vegetables, and fruit colon cancer in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Jan 1;139(1):1-15. Abstract
- The New York University Women's Health Study. (1985-1998/96 women)
Kato I, Akhmedkhanov A, Koenig K, Toniolo PG, Shore RE, Riboli E. Prospective study of diet and female colorectal cancer: the New York University Women's Health Study. Nutr Cancer. 1997;28(3):276-81. Abstract
- The Nurses' Health Study A + B. (A = 1980-1986/162 women. B = 1986-2000/429 women)
Michels KB, Edward Giovannucci, Joshipura KJ, Rosner BA, Stampfer MJ, Fuchs CS. Prospective study of fruit and vegetable consumption and incidence of colon and rectal cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Nov 1;92(21):1740-52. Full text
- The Prospective Study on Hormones, Diet and Breast Cancer. (1987-2001/ 43 women)
Sieri S, Krogh V, Muti P, Micheli A, Pala V, Crosignani P. Fat and protein intake and subsequent breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Nutr Cancer. 2002;42(1):10-7. Abstract
- The Swedish Mammography Cohort. (1987-2003/484 women)
Terry P, Giovannucci E, Michels KB, Bergkvist L, Hansen H, Holmberg L. Fruit, vegetables, dietary fiber, and risk of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Apr 4;93(7):525-33. Full text
- The Women's Health Study. (1993-2003/163 women)
Lin J, Zhang SM, Cook NR, Rexrode KM, Liu S, Manson JE. Dietary intakes of fruit, vegetables, and fiber, and risk of colorectal cancer in a prospective cohort of women (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Apr;16(3):225-33. Abstract
RELATIVE RISK:
RR = 0.97 (0.90-1.03; No P-value) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption. | BMI; height; education; physical activity; family history of colorectal cancer; postmenopausal hormone use; oral contraceptive use; use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; multivitamin use; smoking habits (never/past/current + amount); red meat; total milk; alcohol; and total energy. Age in years and year of questionnaire return were included as stratification variables. |
| 27) Park Y. (2007) | The NIH-AARP Diet And Health Study. | 488,043 (291,094 men and 196,949 women) aged 50-71. (USA) | 4,3 (1996-2000) | 2,972? (2,048 men and 924 women) | colorectal cancer risk | Legumes (included dried beans, string beans, and peas) |
| Men: | Women: |
RR = 0.95 (0.83-1.08; P = 0.85) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (median intake in servings/1,000 kcal/day):
0.08: RR = 1.
0.17: RR = 0.89 (0.78-1.02).
0.27: RR = 0.91 (0.79-1.04).
0.40: RR = 0.92 (0.80-1.05).
0.69: RR = 0.95 (0.83-1.09).
|
RR = 1.13 (0.91-1.40; P = 0.22) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (median intake in servings/1,000 kcal/day):
0.09: RR = 1.
0.19: RR = 1.07 (0.86-1.32).
0.30: RR = 1.18 (0.95-1.45).
0.45: RR = 1.28 (1.05-1.58).
0.81: RR = 1.13 (0.91-1.40). |
One serving = 1/2 cup (1 cup = 237).education, physical activity, smoking (smoking/past/current. And < or = 20 vs > 20 cigarettes/day), alcohol, red meat, dietary calcium, total energy |
| 23) Lin J. (2005) | The Women's Health Study. | 36,976 women aged > or = 45 years. (USA) | 10 | 223 (91 proximal colon, 81 distal colon, 46 rectum, 5 undesignated colon) | colorectal cancer risk | Legumes (beans, lentils, lima beans, peas, string beans, soybeans, tofu) |
| Colorectal cancer: | Distal colon cancer: |
RR = 0.83 (0.54-1.28; P = 0.19) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings/day):
0.1: RR = 1.
0.2: RR = 0.66 (0.43-1.01).
0.4: RR = 0.90 (0.59-1.38).
0.5: RR = 0.95 (0.66-1.38).
0.9: RR = 0.83 (0.54-1.28).
|
RR = 0.56 (0.26-1.19; P = 0.05) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings/day):
0.1: RR = 1.
0.2: RR = 0.68 (0.35-1.34).
0.4: RR = 1.15 (0.61-2.16).
0.5: RR = 0.62 (0.32-1.20).
0.9: RR = 0.56 (0.26-1.19).
|
No association with proximal colon cancer risk (no data shown). No relationship with rectal cancer was assessed due to the small number of cases.age, randomized treatment assignment, BMI, family history of colorectal cancer, history of colon polyps, physical activity, smoking status, baseline aspirin use, red meat intake, alcohol consumption, total energy intake, menopausal status, baseline post-menopausal HT use, folate intake and multivitamin use. Glycemic load in the multivariate model did not change the overall results. |
| 18) Bueno-de-Mesquita HB (2002) | The EPIC Study. | 123,017 men and 283,422 women from 9 European countries. | 3.3 for men, 4.4 for women (1993-99 to 2001) | 773 | Colorectal cancer risk | Legumes (for example, white beans, haricot beans, chickpeas and lentils) |
| Men: | Women: |
HR = 0.95 (P = 0.82) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (g/d):
0-1: HR = 1.
1-3: HR = 0.82.
3-8: HR = 0.79.
8-23: HR = 0.88.
23+: HR = 0.95.
|
HR = 1.66 (P = 0.03) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (g/d):
0-1: HR = 1.
1-5: HR = 1.37.
5-11: HR = 1.56.
11-26: HR = 1.53.
26+: HR = 1.66.
|
Stratified by centre and age. Adjusted for weight, height, smoking, physical activity at work, intake of energy, intake of ethanol, and fruit. |
| 17) Flood A. (2002) | The Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (BCDDP). | 45,490 women. (USA) | 8.5-8.7 (1987-89 to 1995-98) | 485? | colorectal cancer risk | beans |
RR = 1.03 (0.78-1.37) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings per 1000 kJ/day):
< 0.001: RR = 1.
0.006: RR = 1.36 (1.04-1.78).
0.016: RR = 0.87 (0.65-1.18).
0.034: RR = 1.07 (0.80-1.42).
0.080: RR = 1.03 (0.78-1.37). | Energy, multivitamin supplement use, BMI, height, use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, smoking status, education level, physical activity, and intakes of fruit, grains, red meat, calcium, vitamin D, and alcohol. |
| 9) Voorrips LE. (2000) | The Netherlands Cohort Study. | 62,573 women and 58,279 men aged 55-69. (The Netherlands) | 6.3 (1986-1992) | 578? colon (312 men, 266 women), and 314? rectal (199 men, 115 women) | Colorectal cancer risk | Legumes (string beans, broad beans) |
Colon cancer risk:
| Men | Women |
RR = 1.13 (0.77-1.64; P = 0.41) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (g/day):
11: RR = 1.
22: RR = 0.95 (0.65-1.40).
30: RR = 0.83 (0.55-1.25).
40: RR = 1.02 (0.69-1.51).
62: RR = 1.13 (0.77-1.64).
|
RR = 0.79 (0.52-1.20; P = 0.58) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (g/day):
10: RR = 1.
18: RR = 0.65 (0.42-1.00).
26: RR = 1.02 (0.68-1.51).
37: RR = 0.86 (0.57-1.29).
58: RR = 0.79 (0.52-1.20).
|
Rectal cancer risk:
| Men | Women |
RR = 0.92 (0.58-1.47; P = 0.97) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (g/day):
11: RR = 1.
22: RR = 0.89 (0.56-1.42).
30: RR = 0.90 (0.56-1.46).
40: RR = 1.07 (0.67-1.69).
62: RR = 0.92 (0.58-1.47).
|
RR = 1.01 (0.53-1.94; P = 0.59) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (g/day):
10: RR = 1.
18: RR = 1.07 (0.57-2.00).
26: RR = 1.40 (0.77-2.57).
37: RR = 1.44 (0.79-2.62).
58: RR = 1.01 (0.53-1.94).
|
Age, family history of colorectal cancer, and alcohol. Total energy intake, smoking, physical activity, and BMI were evaluated as potential confounders. |
| 8) Sellers TA (1998) | The Iowa Women's Health Study. | 35,216 women aged 55-69 years. (USA) | 10 (1986-1995) | 241 (180 without, 61 with a family history of colon cancer) | colon cancer risk | Legumes |
Stratified on family history of colon cancer:
| No family history | Positive family history |
RR = 1.0 (0.7-1.5; P = 0.9) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings/wk):
≤ 2: RR = 1.
2.1-3.5: RR = 1.1 (0.8-1.6).
> 3.5: RR = 1.0 (0.7-1.5).
|
RR = 1.5 (0.8-2.7; P = 0.2) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings/wk):
≤ 2: RR = 1.
2.1-3.5: RR = 1.2 (0.6-2.4).
> 3.5: RR = 1.5 (0.8-2.7).
|
age, total energy, and history of rectal colon polyps. |
| 8) Steinmetz KA. (1994) | The Iowa Women's Health Study. | 35,216 women aged 55-69. (USA) | 5 (1986-1990) | 212? (86 proximal, and 120 distal) | Colon cancer risk | Legumes (Beans/lentils, fava beans, hummus, mung beans, tempeh, tofu/soybeans) |
| Colon: | Proximal colon: | Distal colon: |
RR = 0.95 (0.66-1.36) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings/week):
0: RR = 1.
0.5: RR = 0.72 (0.52-0.98).
≥ 1.0: RR = 0.95 (0.66-1.36).
|
RR = 1.27 (0.74-2.18) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings/week):
0: RR = 1.
0.5: RR = 0.73 (0.44-1.20).
≥ 1.0: RR = 1.27 (0.74-2.18).
|
RR = 0.75 (0.46-1.22) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings/week):
0: RR = 1.
0.5: RR = 0.66 (0.44-0.99).
≥ 1.0: RR = 0.75 (0.46-1.22).
|
Age, energy. The effect of adjustment of the vegetable and fruit associations for the following factors was negligible: BMI, parity, age at first live birth, physical activity, smoking, education, history of polyps or colitis, and alcohol intake. |
| 6) Michels KB. (2000) | The Nurses' Health Study & The Health Professionals' Follow-up Study. | 88,764 women aged 34-59 and 47,325 men aged 40-75. (USA) | Women: 16 (1980-1996).
Men: 10 (1986-1996) | Colon cancer: 937 (368 men, 569 women).
Rectal cancer: 244 (89 men, 155 women). | Colorectal cancer risk | Legumes (defined as: beans, lentils, lima beans, peas, soybeans, tofu) FFq |
Colon cancer risk:
| Women | Men |
RR = 1.28 (No 95% CI; No P-value) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption
Amount specific data (servings/wk):
< 1: RR = 1.
1: RR = 1.19.
2: RR = 1.25.
3: RR = 1.25.
≥ 4: RR = 1.28.
|
RR = 0.97 (No 95% CI; No P-value) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption
Amount specific data (servings/wk):
< 1: RR = 1.
1: RR = 1.14.
2: RR = 0.88.
3: RR = 1.02.
≥ 4: RR = 0.97.
|
(colon cancer):
| No vitamin supplement users | Vitamin supplement users |
| Men + women combined: RR = 1.52 (0.91-2.54) for 1 additional serving/day. | Women: RR = 1.55 (1.04-2.31) for 1 additional serving/day. Men: RR = 0.65 (0.37-1.16) for 1 additional serving/day. |
men + women combined (colon cancer):
| Never smokers | Ever smokers |
| RR = 0.98 (0.60-1.62) for 1 additional serving/day. | RR = 1.34 (0.93-1.95) for 1 additional serving/day. |
Rectal cancer risk:
| Women | Men |
RR = 1.14 (No 95% CI; No P-value) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption
Amount specific data (servings/wk):
< 1: RR = 1.
1: RR = 0.99.
2: RR = 1.11.
3: RR = 1.21.
≥ 4: RR = 1.14.
|
RR = 1.72 (No 95% CI; No P-value) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption
Amount specific data (servings/wk):
< 1: RR = 1.
1: RR = 1.91.
2: RR = 0.93.
3: RR = 0.76.
≥ 4: RR = 1.72.
|
age, family history of colorectal cancer, sigmoidoscopy, height, body mass index, pack-years of smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, (women: menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use,) aspirin use, vitamin supplement intake (ever use of multivitamins or vitamins A, C, or E), total caloric intake, and red meat consumption. |
| 4) Heilbrun LK (1989) | The Japan-Hawaii Cancer Study. | 8,006 American Japanese men from Hawaii. (Nested case-control) | 16 (1965-68 to ?) | Colon: 102 Rectal: 60 | Colorectal cancer incidence | Legumes, seeds, and nuts (not defined) | A nonsignificanly lower mean intake for both colon (23.8 g/day), and rectal (20.2 g/day) cancer cases was noted as compared to controls (28.6 g/day).
A significant dose-response was found with rectal, but less so with colon cancer (no data shown). | Age. |
| 2) Singh PN. (1998) | The Adventist Health Study. | 32,051 non-Hispanic white cohort members aged ≥ 25. (USA) | 6 (1977-1982) | 144 | colon cancer risk (adenocarcinomas) | Legumes (beans, lentils, or split peas). |
RR = 0.53 (0.33-0.86; P = 0.03) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumpion.
Amount specific data (frequency of consumption/week):
Never to < 1: RR = 1.
1-2: RR = 0.71 (0.49-1.02).
> 2: RR = 0.53 (0.33-0.86).
RR for nonvegetarians who had a low legume intake: 2.54 (1.20-5.37; No P-value). This risk was restricted to those with a BMI of > or = 25 kg/m2: RR = 3.19 (1.62-6.26; No P-value), and was stronger for men (RR = 5.10 [1.48-17.5; No P-value]) than for women (RR = 2.00 [0.78-5.11; No P-value]). The increased risk was not materially different for a "high-moderate" physical activity level (RR = 2.82; 95% CI = 1.23-6.46) as compared with a "non/low" physical activity lever (RR = 3.42; 95% CI = 0.99-11.9). Exclusion of current/past smokers and alcohol consumers did not substantially alter this association. | Age, sex, BMI, physical activity, parental history of colon cancer, current smoking, past smoking, alcolhol consumption, and aspirin use. |
Prospective studies of legumes and colorectal cancer mortality:
| Author | Cohort name | Subjects | Years of follow-up | Cases | End point | Consumption of | Relative Risk (RR) | Adjustments |
| 22) Iso H (2007) | The JACC Study. | 41,816 men, and 57,985 women. (Japan) | Not defined. | 191 men, and 196 women. | Colon cancer mortality | Boiled beans (not defined) |
| Men: | Women: |
HR = 1.53 (1.04-2.25; P = < 0.05) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data:
< 1/w: HR = 1.
1-2/w: HR = 1.19 (0.82-1.73).
≥ 3/w: HR = 1.53 (1.04-2.25).
|
HR = 1.05 (0.72-1.53) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data:
< 1/w: HR = 1.
1-2/w: HR = 0.92 (0.63-1.33).
≥ 3/w: HR = 1.05 (0.72-1.53).
|
Age and study area. |
| 22) Iso H (2007) | The JACC Study. | 41,816 men, and 57,985 women. (Japan) | Not defined. | 148 men, and 76 women. | Rectal cancer mortality | Boiled beans (not defined) |
| Men: | Women: |
HR = 1.59 (1.03-2.48; P = < 0.05) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data:
< 1/w: HR = 1.
1-2/w: HR = 0.99 (0.63-1.57).
≥ 3/w: HR = 1.59 (1.03-2.48).
|
HR = 0.75 (0.39-1.44) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data:
< 1/w: HR = 1.
1-2/w: HR = 0.46 (0.22-0.96; P = < 0.05).
≥ 3/w: HR = 0.75 (0.39-1.44).
|
Age and study area. |
| | | | | | | | |