| 29) Wright ME (2008) | The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study | 472,081 subjects (281,288 men and 190,793 women) aged 50-71. (USA) | 8 (1995-2003) | See variables | Lung cancer risk | Vitaceae (grapes) |
All men (3,834 cases): RR = 0.94 (0.85-1.04; P = 0.47) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings per 1000 kcal per day):
0.002: RR = 1.
0.01: RR = 0.95 (0.87-1.05).
0.03: RR = 0.93 (0.84-1.03).
0.06: RR = 0.97 (0.87-1.07).
0.18: RR = 0.94 (0.85-1.04).
Men. Stratified by smoking status:
Never smokers (141? cases) | Former smokers (2,110? cases) | Current smokers (1,583? cases) |
| RR = 0.57 (0.33-0.99; P = 0.07) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
|
RR = 0.94 (0.82-1.07; P = 0.53) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
|
RR = 0.98 (0.83-1.16; P = 0.89) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
|
All women (2,201 cases): RR = 0.99 (0.86-1.13; P = 0.70) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings per 1000 kcal per day):
0: RR = 1.
0.02: RR = 0.93 (0.82-1.05).
0.04: RR = 0.95 (0.84-1.08).
0.08: RR = 1.03 (0.91-1.17).
0.29: RR = 0.99 (0.86-1.13).
Women. Stratified by smoking status:
Never smokers (170? cases) | Former smokers (835? cases) | Current smokers (1,196? cases) |
| RR = 0.88 (0.54-1.45; P = 0.43) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
|
RR = 0.97 (0.78-1.20; P = 0.99) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
|
RR = 1.03 (0.86-1.23; P = 0.42) for the highest vs lowest quintile of consumption.
|
One serving of fruits = 1 medium sized fresh fruit, 1/2 cup of chopped fruit, or 6 ounces of fruit juice.Age, energy intake, race, education, BMI, smoking status, smoking dose, time since quitting, alcohol intake, physical activity, and family history of any cancer. |
| 14) Feskanich D (2000) | The Nurses' Health Study
&
The Health Professionals' Follow-up Study | 77,283 US women (38-63 years) and 47,778 men (40-75 years) | Women: 1984-1996.
Men: 1986-1996. | 516? women, and 258? men | Total lung cancer risk | Raisins/grapes | No significant association with risk (no data shown). | Not defined, but probably: age, follow-up cycle, smoking status,years since quitting among past smokers, cigarettes smoked/day among current smokers, age at start of smoking, total energy intake, and availability of diet data after baseline measure. |
| 11) Voorrips LE (2000) | The Netherlands Cohort Study | 62,573 women and 58,279 men aged 55-69. | 6.3 (1986-1992) | 963 | lung cancer risk | Grapes |
RR = 0.9 (0.7-1.1; P = 0.26) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data (g/day):
0: RR = 1.
2: RR = 1.0 (0.8-1.2).
9: RR = 0.9 (0.7-1.1).
Additional adjustment for total vegetable intake did not change results at all (No data shown). | age, sex, family history of lung cancer, highest educational level, current smoker, years of smoking, number of cigarettes/day and total fruit intake. |
| 10) Cutler GJ. (2008) | The Iowa Women's Health Study. | 34,708 postmenopausal women aged 55-69. (USA) | 1986-2004 | 849? | Lung cancer risk | Raisins/grapes | Stratified by smoking history, intake of raisins/grapes (> or = 1 vs < 1 time/wk) was not associated with risk of lung cancer (No data shown). | Age, energy, education, race, BMI, multivitamin use, activity level, and pack years. |
Prospective studies of grapes and lung cancer mortality:
| Author | Cohort name | Subjects | Years of follow-up | Cases | End point | Consumption of | Relative Risk (RR) | Adjustments |
| 9) Chow WH (1992) | The Lutheran Brotherhood Study | 17,633 white men aged 35 or over. (USA) | 20 (1966-1986) | 219 | lung cancer mortality | Grapes | Linked to a lower risk of lung cancer death, but nonsignificant (no data shown). | Age, industry/occupation, and smoking status. |
|