| Author | Cohort name | Subjects | Years of follow-up | Cases | End point | Consumption of | Relative Risk (RR) | Adjustments |
| 9) Koushik A (2005) | Pooled analysis of 12 cohort studies. | 560,441 women. | 7-22 | 2,130? | Invasive epithelial ovarian cancer risk | Rutaceae |
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
- At least 50 incident invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases.
- An assessment of usual diet.
- A validation study of the diet assessment method or a closely related instrument.
INCLUDED STUDIES (Follow-up years/No. of ovarian cancer casses):
- The Adventist Health Study (1976-1988/53).
Singh PN. Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Oct 15;148(8):761-74. Full text
- The Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (1987-1999/142).
Hannan LM. Physical activity and risk of ovarian cancer: a prospective cohort study in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 May;13(5):765-70. Full text
- The Canadian National Breast Screening Study (1980-2000/223).
Terry PD. Cigarette smoking and the risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer in a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2003 May;39(8):1157-64. Abstract
- The Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort (1992-2001/278).
Calle EE. The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics. Cancer. 2002 Jan 15;94(2):500-11. Abstract
- The Iowa Women's Health Study (1986-2001/208).
Kushi LH. Prospective study of diet and ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jan 1;149(1):21-31 Full text
- The Netherlands Cohort Study (1986-1995/208).
Mommers M. Consumption of vegetables and fruits and risk of ovarian carcinoma. Cancer. 2005 Oct 1;104(7):1512-9. Full text
- The New York State Cohort (1980-1987/77).
Bandera EV. Diet and alcohol consumption and lung cancer risk in the New York State Cohort (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1997 Nov;8(6):828-40. Abstract
- The New York University Women's Health Study (1985-1998/65).
Kato I. Prospective study of diet and female colorectal cancer: the New York University Women's Health Study. Nutr Cancer. 1997;28(3):276-81. Abstract
- The Nurses' Health Study A + B (A = 1980-1986/120. B = 1986-2002/315).
Fairfield KM. Risk of ovarian carcinoma and consumption of vitamins A, C, and E and specific carotenoids: a prospective analysis. Cancer. 2001 Nov 1;92(9):2318-26. Full text
- The Nurses' Health Study II (1991-2000/52).
Cho E. Premenopausal fat intake and risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Jul 16;95(14):1079-85. Full text
- The Swedish Mammography Cohort (1987-2004/285).
Larsson SC. Fruit and vegetable consumption in relation to ovarian cancer incidence: the Swedish Mammography Cohort. Br J Cancer. 2004 Jun 1;90(11):2167-70. Full text
- The Women's Health Study (1993-2004/104).
Higginbotham S. Dietary glycemic load and breast cancer risk in the Women's Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Jan;13(1):65-70. Full text
RELATIVE RISK:
RR = 0.99 (0.95-1.03) for a 100 g/day increment.
| Parity, oral contraceptive use, menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use, age at menarche, BMI, physical activity, smoking status, and total energy intake. Age in years and year of questionnaire return were included as stratification variables. |
| 7) Mommers M (2005) | The Netherlands Cohort Study | 62,573 postmenopausal women aged 55-69. | 11,3 (1986-1997) | 252? | Invasive epithelial ovarian cancer incidence | Citrus fruit (mandarins, oranges and fresh orange juice, grapefruits and fresh grapefruit juice) | RR = 1.01 (0.97-1.05) per 25-g per day increment. | Age, height, current cigarette smoking, duration of cigarette smoking, number of cigarettes smoked daily, duration of oral contraceptive use, parity, and total vegetables. |
| 6) Larsson SC (2004) | The Swedish Mammography Cohort | 61,084 women aged 38-76. | 13.5 (1987-90 to 2003) | 266 | Invasive epithelial ovarian cancer incidence | Citrus fruit (oranges, mandarins, and grapefruit) |
RR = 1.11 (0.78-1.59; P = 0.57) for the highest vs lowest quartile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings/week):
< 1.5: RR = 1.
1.5-< 3.0: RR = 1.09 (0.72-1.64).
3.0-< 7.0: RR = 1.06 (0.75-1.50).
≥ 7.0: RR = 1.11 (0.78-1.59). | Age at baseline, BMI, education, parity, oral contraceptive use, fish consumption, and dietary lactose. |
| 4) Fairfield KM (2001) | The Nurses' Health Study | 80,326 women aged 38-63. Excluding women with a history of bilateral oophorectomy, hysterectomy with unknown number of ovaries removed, or history of pelvic irradiation. (USA) | 1984-1996 | 204 | Invasive epithelial ovarian cancer incidence | Total citrus fruit (oranges, orange juice, grapefruit, and grapefruit juice) |
RR = 1.14 (0.76-1.72; P = 0.87) for the highest vs lowest tertile of consumption.
Amount specific data (servings/week):
≤ 1: RR = 1.
2-7: RR = 0.99 (0.67-1.47).
7+: RR = 1.14 (0.76-1.72). | Age, BMI, duration of oral contraceptive use, smoking history, parity, history of tubal ligation, total energy, and dietary fiber. |