Red meat and total cancer.

Total cancer risk: Data was provided by 2 cohorts, including 5,125 cases. No associations were found.
Total cancer mortality: Data was provided by 4 cohorts, including 27,501 cases. A significantly increased risk was found among both men and women in one cohort of very large size (Sinha R [14]). Noticeable is the fact that the risk increased gradually with every quintile of consumption in this cohort. No other associations were found. The average RR = 1.20. This effect size is primarily driven by one single cohort (Sinha R [14]).
Conclusion: A significantly increased cancer mortality risk was found in one cohort of very large size. No other associations were found. Even though the effect size suggests an increased mortality risk of red meat consumption, consistency is low. Inconclusive evidence was found for an association between red meat consumption and total cancer mortality. No associations were found with total cancer risk.

Prospective studies of red meat and total cancer risk:
AuthorCohort nameCasesRelative Risk (RR)
12) Kelemen LE (2005)The Iowa Women's Health Study4,843RR = 0.97 (0.86-1.10; P = 0.64).
7) Cox BD (1997)The HALS282No significant association.
Total number of cases: 5,125


Prospective studies of red meat and total cancer mortality:
AuthorCohort nameCasesRelative Risk (RR)
14) Sinha R (2009)The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study16,433 men, and

8,929 women
Men: HR = 1.22 (1.16-1.29; P = < 0.001).

Women: HR = 1.20 (1.12-1.30; P = < 0.001).
12) Kelemen LE (2005)The Iowa Women's Health Study1,676RR = 1.04 (0.85-1.27; P = 0.52).
11) Khan MM (2004)No cohort name155 men, and

89 women
Men: RR = 1.1 (0.8-1.6).

Women: RR = 1.1 (0.7-1.7).
8) Whiteman D (1999)The OXCHECK Study219RR = 0.88 (0.59-1.93).
Total number of cases: 27,501Average RR = 1.20